I am sorry, but why were you able to just cross off the 16 from in front of the parentheses in line 3? The same applies to subtracting the 4 from the first parentheses. Doesn´t that change the results of m?
Line 3 is transformed into line 4 by dividing both sides of the inequality by 16. That’s why the 16 disappears, and why the (8-4m)^2 becomes (2-m)^2.
Hi, I don’t understand how you got from the equation on the first line to the inequality on the second? where did all the x values go and how did the first bracket become squared?
The first line has a quadratic in the form ax^2 + bx +c = 0.
The second line is equivalent to b^2 – 4ac < 0, which is the condition for the quadratic in the first line to have no real roots.
How did you get that top line to start with?
I just took the equation in the question, subtracted m(4x-3) from both sides, and simplified to create the ax^2 + bx + c = 0 form.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.